






 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grant &#38; Eisenhofer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gelaw.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gelaw.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blowing the Whistle From Abroad: A Guide to the U.S. False Claims Act and the U.S. Dodd-Frank  Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/blowing-the-whistle-from-abroad-a-guide-to-the-false-claims-act-and-dodd-frank-wall-street-reform-and-consumer-protection-act</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/blowing-the-whistle-from-abroad-a-guide-to-the-false-claims-act-and-dodd-frank-wall-street-reform-and-consumer-protection-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=3805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Jay W. Eisenhofer, Reuben A. Guttman and Justin K. Victor The United States Government has established laws providing for bounties to be paid to those who report certain types of fraud. Even foreign citizens are eligible to receive these monetary awards, which are paid under the False Claims Act&#8230; Read Article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by <strong>Jay W. Eisenhofer, Reuben A. Guttman</strong> and <strong>Justin K. Victor</strong></p>
<p>The United States Government has established laws providing for bounties to be paid to those who report certain types of fraud. Even foreign citizens are eligible to receive these monetary awards, which are paid under the False Claims Act&#8230; <strong><a href="http://www.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Blowing-the-Whistle-From-Abroad.pdf" target="_blank">Read Article</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/blowing-the-whistle-from-abroad-a-guide-to-the-false-claims-act-and-dodd-frank-wall-street-reform-and-consumer-protection-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grant &amp; Eisenhofer&#8217;s The Activist</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/newsletter/the-activist</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/newsletter/the-activist#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.gelaw.com/?p=3612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Activist is an informational journal of articles published for our national and overseas clients. View the most recent interactive, online version of The Activist : 2011 Debts Deals Decisions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Activist</em> is an informational journal of articles published for our national and overseas clients.</p>
<p>View the most recent interactive, online version of <em>The Activist</em> :<strong><a href="http://new.gelaw.com.tempwebpage.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/activist_v1_i3_Pages.pdf"><br />
</a><a href="../wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Activist_online_V1_I3.pdf" target="_blank">2011 Debts Deals Decisions</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/newsletter/the-activist/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shareholder Rights and Corporate Governance in the Dodd-Frank Act</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/shareholder-rights-and-corporate-governance-in-the-dodd-frank-act</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/shareholder-rights-and-corporate-governance-in-the-dodd-frank-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=2926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Michael J. Barry and John C. Kairis The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act1 is a massive piece of legislation that is over 2,300 pages long. It authorizes various regulatory bodies to conduct additional studies and to enact rules to implement the Act&#8230; Read Article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by <strong>Michael J. Barry</strong> and <strong>John C. Kairis</strong><br />
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act1 is a massive piece of legislation that is over 2,300 pages long. It authorizes various regulatory bodies to conduct additional studies and to enact rules to implement the Act&#8230;<strong> <a href="http://new.gelaw.com/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Shareholder-Rights-and-Corporate-Governance-in-the-Dodd-Frank-Act.pdf" target="_blank"><a href="http://new.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Shareholder-Rights-and-Corporate-Governance-in-the-Dodd-Frank-Act.pdf">Read Article</a></a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/shareholder-rights-and-corporate-governance-in-the-dodd-frank-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Adopts Proxy Access Rules Making it Easier for Shareholders to Nominate and Remove Directors</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/sec-adopts-proxy-access-rules-making-it-easier-for-shareholders-to-nominate-and-remove-directors</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/sec-adopts-proxy-access-rules-making-it-easier-for-shareholders-to-nominate-and-remove-directors#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=2921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Cynthia A. Calder The ability of shareholders to require that the names of shareholder-nominated candidates for the board of directors be placed on the company’s proxy statement has long been considered the “holy grail” for shareholder activists&#8230; Read Article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by <strong>Cynthia A. Calder</strong><br />
The ability of shareholders to require that the names of shareholder-nominated candidates for the board of directors be placed on the company’s proxy statement has long been considered the “holy grail” for shareholder activists&#8230; <strong><a href="http://new.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Adopts-Proxy-Access-Rules-Making-it-Easier-for-Shareholders-to-Nominate-and-Remove-Directors.pdf" target="_blank">Read Article</a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/sec-adopts-proxy-access-rules-making-it-easier-for-shareholders-to-nominate-and-remove-directors/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overview of the False Claims Act</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/overview-of-the-false-claims-act</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/overview-of-the-false-claims-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=2916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Reuben A. Guttman, Traci Buschner and Justin Victor In 1863 President Abraham Lincoln signed into law the first version of the False Claims Act (FCA), a law inspired by a wave of defense contractor fraud during the Civil War&#8230; Read Article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by <strong>Reuben A. Guttman</strong>,<strong> Traci Buschner</strong> and <strong>Justin Victor</strong><br />
In 1863 President Abraham Lincoln signed into law the first version of the False Claims Act (FCA), a law inspired by a wave of defense contractor fraud during the Civil War&#8230; <strong><a href="http://new.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Overview-of-the-False-Claims-Act.pdf" target="_blank">Read Article</a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/overview-of-the-false-claims-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Financial Reform Legislation Provides Whistleblowers with Monetary Incentives to Report Fraud to SEC</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/new-financial-reform-legislation-provides-whistleblowers-with-monetary-incentives-to-report-fraud-to-sec</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/new-financial-reform-legislation-provides-whistleblowers-with-monetary-incentives-to-report-fraud-to-sec#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=1843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Reuben A. Guttman Under the new legislation, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) was amended to provide whistleblowers with a bounty if they provide information to the SEC which leads to the Agency’s recovery of monetary sanctions&#8230; Read Article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by <strong>Reuben A. Guttman</strong><br />
Under the new legislation, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) was amended to provide whistleblowers with a bounty if they provide information to the SEC which leads to the Agency’s recovery of monetary sanctions&#8230;<br />
<strong><a href="http://new.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2002/05/New-Financial-Reform-Legislation-for-Whistleblowers.pdf" target="_blank">Read Article</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/new-financial-reform-legislation-provides-whistleblowers-with-monetary-incentives-to-report-fraud-to-sec/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Integrity Agreements: Asking the Companies to Police Themselves, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/corporate-integrity-agreements-asking-the-companies-to-police-themselves-please</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/corporate-integrity-agreements-asking-the-companies-to-police-themselves-please#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=2893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Reuben A. Guttman The use of a corporate integrity agreements (“CIA”) in resolving the prosecution of pharmaceutical and medical companies is commonplace&#8230; Read Article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by <strong>Reuben A. Guttman</strong><br />
The use of a corporate integrity agreements (“CIA”) in resolving the prosecution of pharmaceutical and medical companies is commonplace&#8230; <strong><a href="http://new.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Corporate-Integrity-Agreements-Asking-the-Companies-to-Police-Themselves-Please.pdf" target="_blank">Read Article</a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/corporate-integrity-agreements-asking-the-companies-to-police-themselves-please/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Del Monte Foods Settlement Secures $89.4 Million for Shareholders Who Challenged Private Equity Buyout</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/del-monte-foods-settlement-secures-89-4-million-for-shareholders-who-challenged-private-equity-buyout</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/del-monte-foods-settlement-secures-89-4-million-for-shareholders-who-challenged-private-equity-buyout#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=3288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="ext">Payment by Del Monte and Barclays one of the largest cash settlements ever in Delaware Chancery Court; case has upended investment banking practice of offering sell-side financing in M&amp;A transactions.</p>
<p><div class="read-more"><a href="#">Read More</a></div><div class="details">Ending a case that has reformed longstanding conflicts within the investment banking community on M&amp;A deals, <strong>Del Monte Corporation</strong> and <strong>Barclays Capital Inc.</strong> have agreed to pay $89.4 million to Del Monte shareholders who were cashed out in the 2010 buyout of Del Monte by a group of private equity firms.</p>
<p>Grant &amp; Eisenhofer, which has served lead counsel in four of the five largest settlements in the history of Delaware Chancery Court, is co-lead counsel on behalf of a class of Del Monte shareholders who opposed the way in which the storied food company and its investment bank transacted the sale of Del Monte to a consortium of private equity investors.</p>
<p>The payment is one of the largest cash settlements on record in <strong>Delaware Chancery Court </strong>– Del Monte will contribute $65.7 million while Barclays will pay $23.7 million. The lawsuit, which challenged the common practice by many deal advisers to simultaneously offer sell-side financing in a transaction, led to sweeping changes in the way investment banks conduct business in the M&amp;A marketplace.</p>
<p>An injunction ruling earlier this year by Chancery Court <strong>Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster</strong> led to an immediate industry-wide retreat by investment banks from providing financing for deals in which they also represented the sellers. Bloomberg News reported that since the Del Monte ruling came down, “no firm has offered sell-side financing for a U.S. public company buyout valued at more than $1 billion.…In the previous 2 ½ years, it was offered about 40 percent of the time for deals of that size.” As noted corporate governance expert <strong>Larry Hamermesh</strong> of Delaware’s Widener University remarked to Bloomberg, Chancellor Laster’s ruling “got the attention of every bank across Wall Street. It does seem like banks are exercising across-the-board caution after Del Monte.” The deal was eventually approved by a shareholder vote this past March.</p>
<p>The settlement is subject to approval by Vice Chancellor Laster. If approved, it will resolve all litigation over the sale of Del Monte.</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/del-monte-foods-settlement-secures-89-4-million-for-shareholders-who-challenged-private-equity-buyout/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senior Counsel John Radice selected for inclusion in Super Lawyers-Rising Stars Edition 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/senior-counsel-john-radice-selected-for-inclusion-in-super-lawyers-rising-stars-edition-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/senior-counsel-john-radice-selected-for-inclusion-in-super-lawyers-rising-stars-edition-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=2980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About Rising Stars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.superlawyers.com/about/rising_stars.html" target="_blank">About Rising Stars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/senior-counsel-john-radice-selected-for-inclusion-in-super-lawyers-rising-stars-edition-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Adopts New Regulations to Deter Fraudulent Conduct and Excessive Risk Taking</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/sec-adopts-new-regulations-to-deter-fraudulent-conduct-and-excessive-risk-taking</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/sec-adopts-new-regulations-to-deter-fraudulent-conduct-and-excessive-risk-taking#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ge-pa.archerstage.com/?p=2898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by James J. Sabella On December 16, 2009, the SEC voted 4-to-1 to adopt broader proxy disclosure requirements forcing public companies to reveal more information about how they pay their executives&#8230; Read Article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by <strong>James J. Sabella</strong><br />
On December 16, 2009, the SEC voted 4-to-1 to adopt broader proxy disclosure requirements forcing public companies to reveal more information about how they pay their executives&#8230; <strong><a href="http://new.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/SEC-Adopts-New-Regulations.pdf" target="_blank">Read Article</a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/attorney-articles/sec-adopts-new-regulations-to-deter-fraudulent-conduct-and-excessive-risk-taking/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

