






 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grant &#38; Eisenhofer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gelaw.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gelaw.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Firm Directors Adam Levitt and Reuben Guttman to speak at Class Actions and Alternatives For Resolving Aggregate Claims conference in Boston, June  17-18</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/events/firm-directors-adam-levitt-and-reuben-guttman-will-speak-at-the-class-actions-and-alternatives-for-resolving-aggregate-claims-conference-in-boston-june-17-18</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/events/firm-directors-adam-levitt-and-reuben-guttman-will-speak-at-the-class-actions-and-alternatives-for-resolving-aggregate-claims-conference-in-boston-june-17-18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Comprehensive Two-Day Conference on Class Actions and Alternatives For Resolving Aggregate Claims - New decisions, trends, and strategies for plaintiffs and defendants June 17 &#38; 18, 2013 Seaport West Building, Boston, MA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A Comprehensive Two-Day Conference on</em><br />
<strong>Class Actions and Alternatives For Resolving Aggregate Claims</strong><br />
<strong>- New decisions, trends, and strategies for plaintiffs and defendants</strong><br />
June 17 &amp; 18, 2013<br />
Seaport West Building, Boston, MA</p>
<div class="ext"><div class="read-more"><a href="#">Read More</a></div><div class="details">On Monday, June 17, <strong>Adam Levitt</strong> will present an <strong>Update on Trends in MDL Litigation</strong> &#8211; The JPML&#8217;s 1404/1407 Shift and the End of Reflexive Transfer.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, June 18, <strong>Reuben Guttman</strong> will present <strong><em>Qui Tam</em> Litigation as a Model for Replacing Private Class Action Enforcement</strong> from the plaintiff perspective.</div></p>
<p>Click here for <a href="http://www.lawseminars.com/detail.php?SeminarCode=13CLASSMA" target="_blank">conference information</a> or to <a href="https://www.lawseminars.com/register.php?SeminarCode=13CLASSMA" target="_blank">register</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/events/firm-directors-adam-levitt-and-reuben-guttman-will-speak-at-the-class-actions-and-alternatives-for-resolving-aggregate-claims-conference-in-boston-june-17-18/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grant &amp; Eisenhofer Secures Largest Cash Settlement Ever in Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit:  $139 Million Recovered for News Corp</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/grant-eisenhofer-secures-largest-cash-settlement-ever-in-shareholder-derivative-lawsuit-139-million-recovered-for-news-corp-shareholders</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/grant-eisenhofer-secures-largest-cash-settlement-ever-in-shareholder-derivative-lawsuit-139-million-recovered-for-news-corp-shareholders#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recovery stems from claims arising over News Corp phone hacking scandal and company’s acquisition of Shine Group; settlement also includes extensive corporate governance reforms. WILMINGTON, DE (April 22, 2013) – Law firm Grant &#38; Eisenhofer P.A. announced that it has reached a $139 million settlement in the 2011 derivative action on behalf of News Corporation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Recovery stems from claims arising over News Corp phone hacking  scandal and company’s acquisition of Shine Group; settlement also  includes extensive corporate governance reforms.</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>WILMINGTON, DE (April 22, 2013)</strong> – Law firm Grant &amp;  Eisenhofer P.A. announced that it has reached a $139 million settlement  in the 2011 derivative action on behalf of News Corporation  shareholders.  The recovery represents the largest cash derivative  settlement on record. The settlement also includes extensive corporate  governance reforms undertaken by the global media giant in the aftermath  of the shareholder litigation&#8230; <a href="http://stage.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/newscorp_04-22-13.pdf"><strong></strong></a><strong><a href="http://www.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/newscorp_04-22-13.pdf" target="_blank">Read full Press Release</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/grant-eisenhofer-secures-largest-cash-settlement-ever-in-shareholder-derivative-lawsuit-139-million-recovered-for-news-corp-shareholders/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grant &amp; Eisenhofer co-counsel in Class Action Against Groeb Farms and Honey Solutions, Alleging Suppliers Sold Tainted Honey From China</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/news/grant-eisnhofer-co-counsel-in-class-action-against-groeb-farms-and-honey-solutions-alleging-suppliers-sold-tainted-honey-from-china</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/news/grant-eisnhofer-co-counsel-in-class-action-against-groeb-farms-and-honey-solutions-alleging-suppliers-sold-tainted-honey-from-china#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suit filed by domestic producers alleges two largest industrial honey suppliers in U.S. imported mislabeled, adulterated honey from China; complaint follows nearly five-year “Honeygate” investigation led by U.S. Department of Homeland Security; law firm Grant &#38; Eisenhofer P.A. is co-counsel to plaintiffs CHICAGO (April 19, 2013) – Three domestic honey producers – Adee Honey Farms, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><em><strong>Suit filed by domestic producers alleges two largest industrial honey suppliers in U.S. imported mislabeled, adulterated honey from China; complaint follows nearly five-year “Honeygate” investigation led by U.S. Department of Homeland Security; law firm Grant &amp; Eisenhofer P.A. is co-counsel to plaintiffs</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO (April 19, 2013) </strong>– Three domestic honey producers – Adee Honey Farms, Bill Rhodes Honey Company, LLC, and Hackenberg Apiaries – filed a class action complaint this week in the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition to the three named honey producers, the lawsuit asserts claims on behalf of a nationwide class defined as all individuals and entities “with commercial beekeeping operations (300 or more hives) that produced and sold honey in the United States during the period from 2001 to the present”&#8230; <a href="http://www.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Adee-Press-Release.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>Read full Press Release</strong></a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/news/grant-eisnhofer-co-counsel-in-class-action-against-groeb-farms-and-honey-solutions-alleging-suppliers-sold-tainted-honey-from-china/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grant &amp; Eisenhofer represent whistleblower in $24.9 million settlement with biotechnology company Amgen, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/firm-director-reuben-guttman-senior-counsel-traci-buschner-and-associate-justin-victor-represent-whistleblower-in-24-9-million-settlement-with-biotechnology-company-amgen-inc</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/firm-director-reuben-guttman-senior-counsel-traci-buschner-and-associate-justin-victor-represent-whistleblower-in-24-9-million-settlement-with-biotechnology-company-amgen-inc#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><div class="ext">COLUMBIA, South Carolina</strong> —-United States Attorney  Bill Nettles announced a $24.9 million settlement with Amgen, Inc., a  California based biotechnology company. Amgen, Inc. agreed to the  settlement to address allegations it paid kickbacks to long-term care  pharmacy providers Omnicare Inc., PharMerica Corporation, and Kindred  Healthcare Inc. in return for implementing “therapeutic interchange”  programs that were designed to switch <a title="Medicare" href="http://www.whistleblowerlaws.com/types-of-fraud/medicare-medicaid-fraud/" target="_blank">Medicare</a> and Medicaid beneficiaries from a competitor drug to Aranesp.<div class="read-more"><a href="#">Read More</a></div><div class="details"></p>
<p>The Government alleged that the kickbacks took the form of  performance-based rebates on Aranesp. As part of that program, the  Government alleged that Amgen distributed materials designed to  recommend Aranesp’s use in patients who did not have “anemia associated  with chronic renal failure,” as specified in the approved labeling for  Aranesp.</p>
<p>The District of South Carolina began investigating these <a title=" False Claims Act" href="http://www.whistleblowerlaws.com/false-claims-act/" target="_blank">False Claims Act</a> allegations in the summer of 2010. In particular, the investigation  focused on whether Aranesp was marketed to patients, many of whom were  in skilled nursing facilities, who did not have “anemia associated with  chronic renal failure.”</p>
<p>The False Claims Act allows the government to bring civil actions  against entities that knowingly use or cause the use of false documents  to obtain money from the government or to conceal an obligation to pay  money to the government. The lawsuit in this case was initially filed by  an Amgen employee under the <em>qui tam</em> or <a title=" whistleblower" href="http://www.whistleblowerlaws.com/are-you-a-whistleblower/" target="_blank">whistleblower</a> provision of the False Claims Act. This provision entitles a private  person to bring a lawsuit on behalf of the United States, where the  private person has information that the named defendant has knowingly  violated the False Claims Act. Under the False Claims Act, the private  person, also known as a “whistleblower,” is entitled to a share of the  government’s recovery. In this matter, the whistleblower shall receive  over $3 million from the proceeds of the settlement.</p>
<p>“By this agreement we are making important strides in holding drug  manufacturers accountable for fraudulent and abusive practices not only  in South Carolina, but nationwide. I am proud of the tireless work of  this office to investigate this case across the country,” said U.S.  Attorney Nettles.</p>
<p>This settlement was the result of a coordinated effort by Assistant  United States Attorneys Fran Trapp and James Leventis of the U.S.  Attorney’s Office for the District of South Carolina, along with the  Commercial Litigation Branch of the Justice Department’s Civil Division,  FDA’s Office of Inspector General, HHS’s Office of Inspector General,  and Defense Criminal Investigating Service, who diligently worked to  investigate the allegations and litigate the case.</p>
<p>The whistleblower was represented by South Carolina attorney Richard  Harpootlian along with the firm of Grant &amp; Eisenhofer (G&amp;E)  including firm director Reuben Guttman, of the Washington, D.C. office,  who heads the G&amp;E False Claims Litigation Group, Traci Buschner,  Senior Counsel, also of G&amp;E’s Washington office, and Justin Victor,  Associate at G&amp;E&#8217;s Wilmington office.</div></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/featured/firm-director-reuben-guttman-senior-counsel-traci-buschner-and-associate-justin-victor-represent-whistleblower-in-24-9-million-settlement-with-biotechnology-company-amgen-inc/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firm Director Adam Levitt to join other prominent panelists in a mass tort discussion at the ABA Annual Section of Litigation Conference in Chicago, April 26</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/uncategorized/firm-director-adam-levitt-to-join-other-prominent-panelists-in-a-mass-tort-discussion-at-the-aba-annual-section-of-litigation-conference-in-chicago-april-26</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/uncategorized/firm-director-adam-levitt-to-join-other-prominent-panelists-in-a-mass-tort-discussion-at-the-aba-annual-section-of-litigation-conference-in-chicago-april-26#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABA Section of Litigation Section Annual Conference April 24–26, 2013 JW Marriott, Chicago Firm Director Adam J. Levitt joins Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and Professor Francis McGovern, of Duke University School of Law, in a panel discussion on the topic &#8220;Disaster Averted, Mass [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>ABA Section of Litigation</em><strong><br />
Section Annual Conference</strong><br />
April 24–26, 2013<br />
JW Marriott, Chicago</p>
<p>Firm Director Adam J. Levitt joins Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier,  of the United States District Court for the Northern District of  Illinois, and Professor Francis McGovern, of Duke University School of  Law, in a panel discussion on the topic <strong>&#8220;Disaster Averted, Mass Tort Resolved — Settling Tort Disaster Cases.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>The ABA Section Annual Conference conference for litigators  brings together lawyers and judges from across the country for the  latest in trial advocacy&#8230; <a href="http://stage.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/SAC_2013_brochure.pdf" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.gelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/SAC_2013_brochure.pdf" target="_blank">Click here for conference brochure</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/uncategorized/firm-director-adam-levitt-to-join-other-prominent-panelists-in-a-mass-tort-discussion-at-the-aba-annual-section-of-litigation-conference-in-chicago-april-26/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grant &amp; Eisenhofer files consumer class action alleging acceleration defects in potentially millions of Ford vehicles</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/news/grant-eisenhofer-files-consumer-class-action-alleging-acceleration-defects-in-potentially-millions-of-ford-vehicles</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/news/grant-eisenhofer-files-consumer-class-action-alleging-acceleration-defects-in-potentially-millions-of-ford-vehicles#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you bought or leased one or more vehicles manufactured by Ford Motor Company, in the United States, between 2002 and 2010, your vehicle may be at risk for sudden unintended acceleration caused by dangerous design defects and the absence of necessary protections that have resulted in vehicle collisions, deaths, and injuries to occupants and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>If you bought or leased one or more vehicles manufactured by Ford Motor Company, in the United States, between 2002 and 2010, your vehicle may be at risk for sudden unintended acceleration caused by dangerous design defects and the absence of necessary protections that have resulted in vehicle collisions, deaths, and injuries to occupants and pedestrians&#8230; <strong><a href="http://www.gelaw.com/ford" target="_blank">To learn more click here</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/news/grant-eisenhofer-files-consumer-class-action-alleging-acceleration-defects-in-potentially-millions-of-ford-vehicles/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firm Director Reuben Guttman comments on market integrity in China  in The Global Legal Post</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-market-integrity-in-china-in-the-global-legal-post</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-market-integrity-in-china-in-the-global-legal-post#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking For Market Integrity In China Economic forces globally are driving conformity in a wide range of practices, says Reuben Guttman. With political and cultural difference tempered by economic goals, Hong Kong and mainland China are searching for mechanisms to create greater integrity in financial markets and generally maintain China as a place for investment&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Looking For Market Integrity In China</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Economic forces globally are driving conformity in a wide range of practices, says Reuben Guttman.</em></strong></p>
<p>With political and cultural difference tempered by economic goals,  Hong  Kong and mainland China are searching for mechanisms to create  greater  integrity in financial markets and generally maintain China as a  place  for investment&#8230; <a href="http://www.globallegalpost.com/blogs/global-view/looking-for-market-integrity-in-china-98462919/#.UWgi60rhd8E" target="_blank"><strong>Read the full April 2 commentary</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-market-integrity-in-china-in-the-global-legal-post/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firm Director Reuben Guttman reports in The Global Legal Post on a recent training event with financial fraud prosecutors in Shanghai</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-reports-on-recent-training-event-with-financial-fraud-prosecutors-in-shanghai</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-reports-on-recent-training-event-with-financial-fraud-prosecutors-in-shanghai#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Global Legal Norms As multinationals move around the globe, legal systems are cross-pollinated. China is a case in point, says Reuben Guttman who has just returned from an event in Shanghai dealing with securities dereliction. On a Saturday afternoon this month, I was part of a team of four faculty members from Emory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The New Global Legal Norms</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>As  multinationals move around the globe, legal systems are   cross-pollinated.  China is a case in point, says Reuben Guttman  who   has just returned from an event in Shanghai dealing with securities   dereliction. </strong></em></p>
<p>On a Saturday afternoon this month, I was part of a team of four   faculty members from Emory University Law School’s Center for Advocacy   and Dispute Resolution participating in a training dialogue with   Shanghai  financial fraud prosecutors. The topic of the training was   investigation and prosecution of insider trading cases&#8230;<em> </em><strong><a href="http://m.globallegalpost.com/blogs/commentary/the-new-global-legal-norms-40084356/" target="_blank">Read the full March 21 commentary</a> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-reports-on-recent-training-event-with-financial-fraud-prosecutors-in-shanghai/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firm Director Reuben Guttman comments on LIBOR fines in an article for The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-libor-fines-in-an-article-for-the-lawyer</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-libor-fines-in-an-article-for-the-lawyer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are These LIBOR Fines All Fine? Lack of accountability and minuscule nature of payouts throws doubt on whether fines are a serious deterrent. Almost every week there seems to be an announcement that some regulator has settled claims for a sum of money that to most seem staggering. Yet the question remains: are eye-wateringly high [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are These LIBOR Fines All Fine?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>Lack of accountability and minuscule nature of payouts throws doubt on whether fines are a serious deterrent.</strong></em></p>
<p>Almost every week there seems to be an announcement that some regulator   has settled claims for a sum of money that to most seem staggering. Yet   the question remains: are eye-wateringly high US dollar settlements  true  deterrents for trillion-dollar enterprises?&#8230; <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/are-these-libor-fines-all-fine/3001106.article" target="_blank"><strong>Read the full February 18 commentary</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-libor-fines-in-an-article-for-the-lawyer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firm Director Reuben Guttman comments on blowing the whistle on performance enhancing drugs in Doping and How We Play the Game</title>
		<link>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-blowing-the-whistle-on-performance-enhancing-drugs-in-doping-and-how-we-play-the-game</link>
		<comments>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-blowing-the-whistle-on-performance-enhancing-drugs-in-doping-and-how-we-play-the-game#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmaloney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gelaw.com/?p=5223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doping and How We Play the Game Now that Lance Armstrong has admitted that he doped, fans across the globe must be wondering what was he thinking? Perhaps he surmised that breaking anti-doping rules is just a part of the game. One thing that Lance Armstrong probably did not anticipate was a federal statute known [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Doping and How We Play the Game</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>Now that Lance Armstrong has admitted that he doped, fans  across the  globe must be wondering what was he thinking? Perhaps he  surmised that  breaking anti-doping rules is just a part of the game.</strong></em></p>
<p>One thing  that Lance Armstrong probably did not anticipate was a  federal statute  known as the False Claims Act, which encourages private  citizen  whistle-blowers with monetary bounties when their efforts are   successful. Undoubtedly, he also did not anticipate that his own   teammate, Floyd Landis, would sue him under that statute&#8230; <strong><a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/news/opinion/doping-and-how-we-play-the-game/nT4bg/" target="_blank">Read the full January 26 commentary</a> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gelaw.com/news/firm-director-reuben-guttman-comments-on-blowing-the-whistle-on-performance-enhancing-drugs-in-doping-and-how-we-play-the-game/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
